I think that we will be returning to this topic on Report because the Minister consistently articulates the issue in terms of what banks do and I consistently try to articulate it in terms of the account holder and his right to have his account ring-fenced from the ambit of this legislation if he so chooses. On the whole, I do not believe that people would want their accounts to be swept into the reclaim fund, as that would push them into a reuniting situation. As we discussed during our previous day in Committee, the reclaim fund may well run out of money for various reasons and it will probably have a lower covenant value than the major commercial banks. Therefore, there is no reason why an account holder should be forced to have his money temporarily confiscated through this legislation, which is drafted from the perspective of the banks rather than that of account holders. As I said, we will return to this matter on Report but, for today, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c345GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:31:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433063
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433063
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433063