I thank noble Lords that have spoken. I accept that there is always the possibility that reuniting can take place, but it is a fall-back and not the core activity. The amendments that I propose in this small group to Clause 10 try to ensure only that the definition is robust. As my noble friend Lord Hamilton said, computers are stupid and, as the noble Lord, Lord Newby, said, banks do not actually exercise their common sense. This is about ensuring that a series of technical rules do not result in a non-common-sense approach and a number of accounts being declared dormant, which would be imposed on an account holder as the requirement for reuniting. That would not necessarily be something that we should seek to do.
The Minister said that the banks would err on the side of protecting customers. I can say only that he is an extraordinarily optimistic man about how banks as commercial institutions acutely operate. I have tried in these amendments to ensure that the Bill protects the customer in those instances in which rules are insensitively applied, and the customer is not protected but required to go through unnecessary procedures such as reuniting.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c340GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:26:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433048
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433048
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433048