I take a slightly different view from that of the noble Lords who have spoken so far because I do see some advantage in having a degree of flexibility to borrow forward and to move on the budget from one year to another. On the point about international credibility, if the Government can act only after having consulted, and therefore effectively on the advice of the Committee on Climate Change—one can assume that they would not act against the advice of the committee—that particular problem is rather less acute than has been suggested by the noble Lord, Lord Teverson. I agree with him that half a per cent seems rather small, and I would be inclined to leave it as it is at 1 per cent in order to give the Government the flexibility to respond to unexpected developments such as, for example, those related to the weather.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Jay of Ewelme
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 January 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c824 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:00:56 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432343
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432343
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432343