UK Parliament / Open data

Nitrate Vulnerable Zones

Proceeding contribution from Philip Dunne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 January 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Nitrate Vulnerable Zones.
It is almost uncanny that every intervention raises a point that I would have mentioned later. My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Indeed, one measure that the Government might consider is to reinstate some relief for that investment through the tax code. There are other costs in addition to the capital costs—for instance, the additional running costs of the proposed storage arrangements will lead to extra costs when dispersing slurry. Given the shorter time frame and the reduced volumes that can be spread at the same time, it will take longer, so there will probably be greater transport costs. I believe that those factors were not properly taken into account in DEFRA's calculations. Sixthly, the most significant aspect on farms other than dairy farms is the proposal to plant cover crops on ground harvested before 1 September that would normally be left as bare stubble over the winter. DEFRA argues that a cover crop would reduce nitrate leaching; it might do so, but I suspect only by a tiny amount. Will the Minister tell us where the idea came from and on what scientific basis it was made?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c29-30WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top