moved Amendment No. 38:
38: Clause 5, page 3, line 33, leave out ““the number of years in the period”” and insert ““five””
The noble Duke said: We had an interesting debate on an earlier occasion when the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, tried to tempt us with the thought of changing away from five years. As far as I could see, the Government were not convinced, and I am not sure that the rest of the Committee was. The amendment would simply tidy up the language of the Bill and make it more precise. The Bill already stipulates that the number of years for a carbon budget period will be five. We see no reason why that cannot be reflected here. The amendment would simplify the language for what the ““annual equivalent”” means; that is, the carbon budget divided by five. I hope that it will find favour with the Minister. I beg to move.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c569-70 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:57:43 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_431004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_431004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_431004