I support the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale. On the first day in Committee, the noble Baroness, Lady Morgan, gave us advance warning of what she was going to say in answer to these amendments. She said: "““It is worth recalling that each of the parliamentary committees that scrutinised the Bill agreed that binding annual targets were not suitable””.—[Official Report, 11/12/07; col. 221.]"
I question that. The Environmental Audit Committee said in paragraph 118 of its report that, "““the Government should still set out an indicative target for UK emissions in each year, so as to apply continual pressure to reduce emissions””."
The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, in paragraph 51 of its report, said that, "““we recommend that clear annual ‘milestones’ are set—and published—by the Committee on Climate Change in order that it may become apparent well before the end of a budgetary period whether or not policies are working””."
The Joint Committee on which I served, in paragraph 69 of its report, said: "““We recommend that, in setting the level of future budgets, the Government should also provide indicative annual milestones to help assess progress on an annual basis””."
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Caithness
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c479 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:59:35 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430914
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430914
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430914