The amendment would cause disruption to the pattern of business and investment. Their offsets from trading would not count towards the UK target. I emphasise the phrase ““the practical effect””, which I have in front of me—I am not splitting hairs over this—as the practical effect would be to stop trading straight away. The consequences of stopping would probably have a major impact on investments relating to creating a low-carbon economy—the very point that the noble Baroness and I agree on. The point I made to the noble Earl, Lord Onslow, was that new, successful businesses, new investments, new assets and new resources will be created in this country as a result of these targets and that that would be put severely at risk because of the disruption of the practical effect of the amendment. That is the simple answer.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c187 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:37:46 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429302
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429302
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429302