I am afraid that for once the noble Lord, Lord Shutt, is wrong. The reclaim fund will be required to publish information, at individual institution level, about which institutions are participating in the scheme, the amount of money transferred into the scheme and the amount of money reunited with account holders. Further, it will also be required to publish the amounts it transfers to BIG. Under company law, too, the reclaim fund will also be required to prepare and file annual accounts with Companies House that may be accessed by all interested parties.
We believe that for the fund to be obliged to publish details of non-participating banks and building societies would require it to take on an onerous monitoring role, reducing the amounts available for distribution, albeit perhaps by a small degree. Such a provision would greatly add to administrative costs and reduce the amounts available for distribution. Publishing these details is not the role of the reclaim fund. Providing the lists of those who are participating will make it fairly obvious who is not.
The case has been put extremely well, and briefly, by the noble Baroness and I am particularly sorry not to be able to go along with the noble Lord, Lord Shutt, on this occasion.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bach
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c92GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:08 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428607
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428607
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428607