No guarantee. However, the purpose of my amendment is to probe what happens. Although we hope it will not happen, it could, , and I have not had a complete set of satisfactory answers to my questions. We cannot necessarily rely on a successor fund being put together because that assumes the banks would, in effect, underwrite a successor scheme. Taking on the liabilities of the first scheme would mean that someone would have to put the money in to pay for it. My probing question was: what happens if it runs out of money? I think the Minister agrees with the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that the private sector would step in. But the Bill does not say so; it provides no remedy or set of solutions should that situation arise.
Between now and Report I shall consider this point further because it is one of a series of points which raise the question, ““Does this thing fly?””. However, for now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c76GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428562
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428562
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428562