The noble Lord’s question deals with the level of competence and probity at which the Financial Services Authority is in a position to regulate. The Treasury is not brought in at that level. We must face the prospect—which is so distant that I seek to allay all concerns and not give to rise to them in this contribution, because it would suggest elements of bad faith—that this body, which controls significant resources, fails in the most extreme circumstances to reach the objectives for which it was established. The most extreme example might be that the directors took almost every resource that they had in annual salary and fees, with nothing distributed, which is hugely unlikely. If such misbehaviour at that most extreme level occurred, it might be necessary for the Treasury to give direction about how the body should work within the original framework for which it was established. If we had no structure for enforcing compliance in that most extreme of all cases, we would be open to the charge that we were creating a body in which there was no public interest to be safeguarded.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c58GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428527
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428527
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428527