To add to what my noble friend Lady Noakes said, does not this direction power amount to a vote of no confidence in the FSA? The Treasury’s own explanation ends by stating that the direction does no more than require a company to give effect to, or to comply with, requirements to which it is already subject under the Bill and which will previously have been approved by Parliament. I thought that the Minister’s explanation yesterday was that the regulatory system was a matter for the FSA, not the Treasury itself.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Eccles
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c54GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:25 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428515
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428515
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428515