It just occurs to me that it would be right to ask a question of the noble Baroness. I am not trying to be clever about this but she seems to have a hierarchy of ambition in the sense that in earlier amendments she has suggested that all banks and all building societies should be able to take part in the alternative scheme. I was more modest than that when I talked about the 10 per cent versus 90 per cent thing. If the banks and building societies availed themselves of that, there would be nothing left for either the pension life boats or anything else that she is suggesting. Will she set out her hierarchy of ambition here, because it is very important to be clear? I know where I stand on this, but I should be interested to know where she stands.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Shutt of Greetland
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c49-50GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:36:15 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428092
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428092
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428092