I do not want to be tedious about this, but the starting point is important. There are many references to the Banking Code, which started 15 years ago. It is amazing that assets also have to be 15 years old. It is possible for a bank to say that there might have been unclaimed assets but they were written off before the Banking Code came into effect and now there are none. The starting point is very important. The bank could say that unclaimed assets were written off to a suspense account, then to the profit-and-loss account, and then were paid out as dividends. The starting point is important, particularly when the Banking Code was, in effect, invented 15 years ago.
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Shutt of Greetland
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c14GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:26:58 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427995
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427995
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427995