I apologise to the committee. Amendment No. 11A is a mistake. It is a duplication.
I support the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield. I agree with everything he has said about the desirability of the longer-term idea. We all know that we suffer from short-termism. When it comes to investing in new facilities, be they buses or other types of transport or the infrastructure that goes with them, the experience is that you get a much better service and investment if there is a longer-term assurance that the services and the partnership will continue. The same applies on the railways. Ten to 15 years is enough time to get a really good structure going. That is one of the many options for operating buses, and it could be a major benefit in attracting new investment and new services and therefore increasing the volume of passengers.
Local Transport Bill [HL] Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Berkeley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 December 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Local Transport Bill [HL] Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
696 c59GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:32 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427460
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427460
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427460