I wish to raise two main issues—why this happened and who is responsible, and the individual concerns of my farmers—but I shall start by paying tribute to Government Ministers. When the news broke on that Friday, they went to some lengths to be in touch with me. My hon. Friend the Member for Woking (Mr. Malins) received the same treatment, as did many other Surrey MPs. Ministers were vigilant about keeping in touch with all of us throughout that weekend, the following week and when the second outbreak occurred.
I also wish to state that it was a pleasure to welcome the Secretary of State to Guildford to meet some of the staff working at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs site in my constituency. I have no doubt that the Government learned a great deal from the 2001 outbreak, and their swift action on animal movements certainly had a significant impact on this outbreak.
However, I am sorry to have to say that most of my praise ends there. There has been a lot of comment about why the outbreak occurred. I wish to highlight a few remarks made in both the Health and Safety Executive report and the Spratt report. First, let me quote from the HSE report:"““However, such was the condition in which we found the site drainage system that we conclude that the requirements for Containment Level 4 were not met…Our conclusion is supported by the evidence we found of long-term damage and leakage, included cracked pipes, unsealed manholes and tree root ingress.””"
It is astounding that the Secretary of State cannot accept that there had been long-term leakage.
What that report goes on to say is even more shattering:"““we are aware of a difference of opinion between IAH and Merial over responsibility for maintenance of a key section of pipe””."
That is astonishing. It sounds a bit like a council arguing about a piece of land and who should cut the grass, with the housing department saying it is highways land and the highways department saying it is housing land. It is incredible that, in a facility that was dealing with such a dangerous virus, people were squabbling madly over who was responsible for a pipe.
Foot and Mouth/Bluetongue
Proceeding contribution from
Anne Milton
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 October 2007.
It occurred during Opposition day on Foot and Mouth/Bluetongue.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c884 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:51:37 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417752
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417752
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417752