The previous clause, which the Minister amended, refers to ““any function””. Does the Minister consider it would be worth amending that to ““a function””? There is a great difference between ““any function””, which has an extremely broad scope and ““a function”” which can be delineated. You cannot claim that you can do anything under the Bill, but specifying ““a function”” allows you to be specific about what it is. I remain concerned that the clause still goes very wide, despite what the Minister has said.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hanham
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 July 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c852 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:24:43 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414195
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414195
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414195