UK Parliament / Open data

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

I am grateful for the Minister’s explanation. It reinforces comments made earlier about the importance of seeing draft regulations before we come to discuss this at the next stage. Some of the provisions are difficult to read because they amend earlier legislation in just a few small words and it is hard to follow quite what the cumulative effect is, but that is something that one has to grapple with. There are different ways of presenting legislation. So much of this depends on regulations that are in the mind of the Government and, however much we are mind readers, we cannot read everything. When the regulations are potentially very important and what the Government have in mind casts a completely different light on what is proposed in the legislation, that leads us to question the legislation itself. I do not mean to lecture the Minister, and I hope that she does not take it that way. I am expressing a degree of frustration, largely with myself for having such difficulty with this, and considerable concern about having to deal with legislation where we cannot understand its totality. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 238ZFB not moved.] Clause 193 agreed to. Clause 194 [Disclosure by monitoring officers of ethical standards officers’ reports]:
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c443 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top