UK Parliament / Open data

WEEE Directive

Proceeding contribution from Malcolm Wicks (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 July 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on WEEE Directive.
That would be a consistency too far, even for the hon. Gentleman—albeit environment in one nation. I will raise that issue with the producers because I, too, understand its importance. I was asked about digital switchover, which we are obviously phasing in across the UK. The switch from cathode ray tubes to liquid crystal displays means that many traditional televisions—as we now think of them—have already been disposed of. I am advised that a study by my Department—now called the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform—and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the impact of switchover has indicated that there should not be an overall increase in volume, but that there may be a slight acceleration in disposal. That is certainly an issue of which we are very aware. I was asked about security issues in terms of computers. I am advised that a number of professional businesses in the UK deal with waste information technology and communication equipment, including personal computers. We will certainly ask our new advisory body on WEEE to introduce recommendations on what, if any, further steps are needed to ensure that such data is protected as part of the new WEEE system. I was also asked about individual producer responsibility. In an ideal world, one could say to the producer, ““You are absolutely responsible for what you have produced””, and, as I have implied, that would make producers responsible. In the UK, we, along with many other member states, face difficulties in identifying practical, workable, solutions for the enforcement of individual producer responsibility. Again, as part of its remit, the new WEEE advisory board will be asked to examine individual producers’ responsibility and to make recommendations on how the system should be introduced here. I am advised that, for understandable technical reasons, no member state has a full workable system at the moment. The hon. Member for Solihull asked me about a particular case that I think related to Benji’s—see I can pronounce it.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c387-8WH 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top