UK Parliament / Open data

Finance Bill

Proceeding contribution from David Drew (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.
I rise to support what the hon. Lady has said. I have a farmer in my constituency, Rob Warren of Moreton Valence, who has undertaken a major capital project that involves building a new milking parlour. The cost of the whole project comes to something over £1 million. Part of the proposal to undertake that work was predicated on getting the agricultural buildings allowance, which, as far as I understand, is tapered down over a period of time. To lose that allowance at this time is, at the very least, problematic to his farm and his business. Without the allowance, it would have been much more difficult for him to develop his proposal—certainly at this time. I have sat down with Mr. Warren at his table in his kitchen—as most of us do when we meet farmers—and I am the first to accept that we are talking about something that is hideously complicated. My simple economist’s brain went no way towards grasping the fine mesh by which the measure has been working over the years. Nevertheless, it seems to have worked in the sense that Mr. Warren and various other people in the agricultural industry have been encouraged to undertake major improvements to increase the efficiency of their businesses—as the hon. Lady said— and, in the case of Mr. Warren’s business, to achieve a greater milk yield. I have seen Mr. Warren’s impressive operation. Will my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary explain why the proposed change was brought forward? While there has been a reduction in corporation tax, the measure will not help business planning in this particular industry. Indeed, it will create a disincentive because farmers who were thinking about making major capital investment have probably reconsidered that. I hope that my right hon. Friend will be able to persuade me and Mr. Warren that the Government have alternative plans so that such important projects can be brought forward. I hope that the measure has not been rushed through, given that it could damage the agricultural trade, which has taken advantage of the allowance. The industry might be peculiar in that it has had a special arrangement with the Treasury. However, it would not be helpful if that arrangement was lost at a time when the agriculture sector is in difficulty and the milk business, especially, is in a somewhat parlous position. I hope that my right hon. Friend will give me some good news and that he can reassure Mr. Warren that his investment was worth while and that the Government are helping him.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c235 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Back to top