UK Parliament / Open data

Housing

Proceeding contribution from Nick Raynsford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 May 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Housing.
The hon. Gentleman is wrong. The seller puts the property on the market and commissions the EPC. If there are problems with the property, it may prompt the seller to carry out improvements, because he will know that they will give him a better chance of selling. That may help to achieve some cost-effective improvements in the property, but that is entirely in the seller’s hands. Abortive costs will arise only if the seller chooses to withdraw the property from the market, whereas in the example I gave prospective buyers who have commissioned surveys, searches and other reports lose their money for reasons entirely out of their control.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
460 c653 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top