Not at this point. [Hon. Members: ““Frit!””] All in good time.
The Labour peer who chaired the House of Lords investigation into the matter said that he could not think of proposals about which so many experts were so strongly critical. His colleague, Lord Tunnicliffe, another Labour peer who led the House of Lords investigation into the regulations, called the Government’s case for HIPs"““the most data-free I have ever seen””."
The Consumers Association, once a great supporter of the packs, now argues that, under the Government, they will be"““of little value but great expense to consumers—an expensive waste of time.””"
Ministers have botched the process from beginning to end. Instead of following the advice of the Chancellor of the Exchequer and listening and learning, they have ploughed on regardless, heedless of their potential damage to the housing market at an acutely delicate time. The change to the way in which we buy and sell our houses is probably the biggest and most jarring intervention in the housing market since Nigel Lawson abolished mortgage interest tax relief. History teaches us that we play politics with people’s homes at our peril, but that is just what Ministers are doing.
Housing
Proceeding contribution from
Michael Gove
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 May 2007.
It occurred during Legislative debate on Housing.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
460 c630 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:32:23 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397110
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397110
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397110