My Lords, I shall not take this matter further, other than adding a few words in conclusion. I remain bewildered that, on the one hand, the noble Baroness can say that there is no conflict and that the provisions in the Bill are entirely consistent with the regulator’s hegemony but that, on the other hand, she is reluctant to say that in the Bill. If the underlying facts confirm the regulator’s hegemony, I see no reason why on Earth that cannot be said in the Bill for the sake of certainty. However, I think that this is now a matter for another place.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Clause 83 [Licensing rules]:
Legal Services Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kingsland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 May 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c135-6 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:30:44 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396689
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396689
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_396689