Many of the documents, especially PFI documents, are in the public domain, and I have studied large numbers of them, as they happen to be more concentrated on my constituency than any other in Britain at the moment. Is not there a danger that the hon. Gentleman is putting up an argument that he cannot substantiate with precise examples? Is not he putting up an Aunt Sally and knocking it down with vague generalisations rather than specifics? As this is a Finance Bill, would not it be better to give specific examples on both the Olympics build and PFI contracts?
Finance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mann
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c737 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:17:03 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391382
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391382
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391382