I am grateful for the Minister’s response. It seems to me that this clause is not drafted quite as precisely as it should be, and I should definitely like to come back at the next stage and improve it. As the Minister is far more expert than I am when it comes to drafting, perhaps he will consider inserting the word ““relevant”” in paragraph (c), so that it reads ““any relevant person”” as opposed to ““any person””, as that might satisfy some of our concerns. I suggest that the drafting could be better.
I will read with care what the Minister said about the contractor. I was not terribly convinced by it but I am sure that, when I come to study it, it will be more illuminating. No doubt before we get to the next stage, the Minister will, with his usual courtesy, make himself available to explain anything that I have not understood. However, I am grateful for his response and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Astor
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 22 March 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c248GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:45 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387513
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387513
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387513