We have to look at this over a longer period. Particularly in the early years, there will be a build-up of schemes in the assessment phase and potentially then under the protection of the fund. I would imagine that there will be a convergence of the levy and the ceiling in later years as more schemes move into the fund. In the early years there is scope for a gap, but I think it would be wrong to try to close it by imposing a higher levy, taking more than is necessary in the short term.
I hope that I have dealt with all the queries and accordingly I urge noble Lords to agree to these orders and regulations.
On Question, Motion agreed to.
Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2007.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c91GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:44:48 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318