My Lords, I echo the words of the noble Earl, Lord Howe, in thanking the Minister for the courtesy and care that he has taken to keep us informed on all the things he has been thinking about during the Bill’s passage. I welcome the fact that we now have fundamental principles in the Bill. At every stage, I have made the point that there is one minority who have not been mentioned in the principles so far; that is, those in custody. I reminded the House several times that the Government used the word ““equivalence”” about their treatment. While there is no mention of that word in the Bill’s principles, and it does not look as if there will be much chance of getting it put in, will the Minister assure us that in the code of practice, ““equivalence”” will be mentioned as a reminder to all those responsible for delivering services to those in custody that that is the standard that they must not only aspire to but maintain?
Mental Health Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Ramsbotham
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 March 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Mental Health Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c124 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:58:10 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381991
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381991
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381991