I agree with a lot of what the noble Lord said about the importance of engaging with these customers, making it specific, addressing people’s particular needs and having the flexibility in the system to do so. That is what is there. With respect, I take issue with some of the wild assertions about caseload overload and the system not working and so on. We must certainly not be complacent. A strong message has come from this engagement, and we must obviously take that seriously.
On funding, I stress—and it has been stressed before, certainly at Second Reading—that the roll-out of Pathways is fully funded. I do not agree that personal advisers do not have sufficient time. The testimony of customers shows that the assertion is not correct. On using external providers, the contracts will specifically state the opposite—people cannot be ignored and all customers, with all conditions, have to be provided with support. That will be a key part of the contractual arrangements and part of the monitoring of the contracts that we put in place.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c202GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:50:34 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380513
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380513
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380513