I think that the safeguards are clear. The threshold test involved in establishing reasonable suspicion is very clear. It has been judged and tested on any number of occasions throughout the judicial process and it has not been found wanting. So I am not entirely sure that my hon. Friend’s point is a reasonable one.
I know that the right hon. Member for Haltemprice and Howden (David Davis), the shadow Home Secretary, has spoken to the Home Secretary about the case that has been alluded to. In that judgment—an open judgment, which is why I can talk about it—reference was made to evidence from Belgium in a similar case that pointed to there being sufficient admissible evidence for a prosecution. I can tell the House, however, that the CPS and the police have looked at the evidence in considerable detail—because it was in the judgment—before imposing the second, weaker, control order. They found, however, that the evidence from the Belgian case was insufficient to be considered admissible for a prosecution in the case of that individual.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
Proceeding contribution from
Tony McNulty
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 February 2007.
It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c437-8 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 06:51:40 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379101
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379101
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379101