I thank the Minister for reading carefully into the record how he sees the system working in future, but I am afraid that, carefully as I listened, I could not hear an answer to my questions. Unless we can have an answer now, I am afraid that these amendments will not remain probing. It sounded ominous when he said that there would be resource implications if backdating into the assessment phase was pursued. It sounded as though they are trying to save money and as though people will have to wait longer than they do at the moment to go on to the higher rate of benefit by waiting through an assessment period that is not fully backdated. If I am wrong, can he say so? Despite making the points pretty clearly and giving the views of the Disability Benefits Consortium and the CPAG, I do not believe that I got a straight answer. Are these expert people just getting it wrong?
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c25GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377935
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377935
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377935