I have no option but to withdraw the amendment, but it occurs to me that this paragraph is very loosely worded in the Bill. It lists all sorts of conditions for the claimant, and sub-paragraph (1)(g), to which the amendment refers, says that the claimant ““is not receiving education””. From what the Minister has just said, that does not mean all education; it means full-time education. Can we amend the Bill so that it reads ““full-time education””?
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c19-20GC
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:48 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377921
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377921
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377921