We on these Benches also look forward to the Government explaining how they propose to deal with this apparent problem and explaining whether people will be worse off. We have touched on this matter already, but one unbreakable thread running through all the contributions on the Bill from these Benches will be the question of who is worse off or who will lose—a question which in general terms I put to the Minister at Second Reading and to which I do not believe we received a satisfactory answer. Clearly, we will return to this matter as we go through the Bill.
As the Disability Benefits Consortium points out, at the moment 16 to 18 year-olds can, while receiving incapacity benefit, attend up to 21 hours a week of education or training that would not be suitable for a person of the same age who did not have that disability. Like the consortium, we welcome this opportunity for the Government to state how they plan to identify students who may be able to benefit from ““disabled student”” rules under the ESA. We support the purpose of the amendment.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c18-9GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:21 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377919
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377919
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377919