UK Parliament / Open data

Hertfordshire Housing Target

Proceeding contribution from Meg Munn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Hertfordshire Housing Target.
I will continue, but I will be happy to give way if I have time at the end. Opposition Members from Hertfordshire have poured scorn on our proposals to extend the green belt in their county on a scale larger than the total area of land that will need to be released from the county elsewhere to provide long-term development. Opposition Members’ understanding of the purpose of the extension is simplistic. We are setting in place a realignment of the overall shape of the green belt, to set clear long-term boundaries to development and protect the countryside from development pressures. It is nonsense to suggest that there is something wrong with reviewing green belts. Doing so will provide certainty, so I am astonished that Opposition Members take issue with that. It has been alleged that the Government are not committed to putting in place the necessary funding for infrastructure. Central to our vision for sustainable communities is that development must be supported by the full range of infrastructure—transport, health, education, green and recreational infrastructure, and so on. We have a proud record of support for growth in the area. Within the constraints of public expenditure, we are looking to ensure that future investment is adequate. [Laughter.] Hon. Members laugh, but every Government must look carefully at what they can afford to do, but this Government is providing— [Interruption.]
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
456 c21WH 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top