moved Amendment No. 61A:
61A: Schedule 6, page 78, line 33, at end insert—
““Request refused: supervisory body to make recommendations
(1) This paragraph applies if—
(a) a request is made for a standard authorisation;
(b) the supervisory body are prohibited by paragraph 50(2) from giving the authorisation;
(c) all assessments except the best interests assessment are positive; and
(d) on the basis of the information taken into account in carrying out the assessment it appears to the supervisory body that there is, or is likely to be, a deprivation of liberty.
(2) The supervisory body shall make recommendations on how a person’s health and social care needs can be met in their best interests without depriving that person of their liberty, and shall monitor the implementation of these recommendations after a period of 14 days.””
The noble Baroness said: The two amendments in this group would have been supported by the noble Lord, Lord Rix, if he were here. They both try, from slightly different angles, to address the same question. When the supervisory body refuses to authorise the deprivation of liberty but believes that an unauthorised deprivation of liberty is taking place, it informs the relevant people, including the police and the relevant inspection body, that that is happening. The purpose of these amendments is to find out from the Minister what steps will be taken once a deprivation of liberty has been identified but not authorised. The Bill does not contain any provision to ensure that the relevant inspection body is informed once the supervisory body has identified that a deprivation of liberty is taking place. Where something is wrong, but it has not been deemed to be a deprivation of liberty, who does what to make sure that that situation does not persist? That is, in essence, the question that lies behind this amendment. I beg to move.
Mental Health Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Barker
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 January 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Mental Health Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c768 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:29:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370223
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370223
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370223