I thought we had drawn Clause 89 quite tightly, because it lists the specific information. It is not our intention to ask for financial information, it is not about assets and it certainly does not allow for fishing expeditions. We are not designating all government departments; one department will be designated. I made the point in my earlier remarks that we recognise that changes in government machinery sometimes affect things.
Clause 90 deals with other people from whom we can ask for other information; for example, banks or credit reference agencies. My view is that we have drawn this in precisely the way we wanted, referring to specific information that government departments would have but no one else would. The courts would request that information—no one else.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Ashton of Upholland
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c124GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:37 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365794
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365794
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365794