Your Lordships might have noticed the sense of wonder on my face when I moved the amendment. That is because I was surprised to find my name attached to it. I note that the names of the noble Lords, Lord Thomas of Gresford and Lord Maclennan of Rogart, are also attached to it, as indeed they are to Amendment No. 119D. Nevertheless, my name comes first and so it was my duty to move this amendment. I am much better informed as a result of listening to the debate. On behalf of everybody who put their name to the amendment, whether they intended to or otherwise, I can at this stage happily withdraw it. We shall look keenly at developments on Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 119C to 119E not moved.]
Clause 85 agreed to.
Clause 86 [Charging orders: power to set financial thresholds]:
[Amendments Nos. 120 to 122 not moved.]
Clause 86 agreed to.
Clause 87 agreed to.
Clause 88 [Action by the court]:
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kingsland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c122-3GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365789
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365789
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365789