Yes, that was done yesterday, but the rest of the group is still there. We had a long speech from the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, which covered many subjects. The point of grouping amendments is to separate subjects, and that should have been done in this case. The noble Lord, Lord Beaumont, responded by not speaking to half his amendments, and quite where they will be addressed I do not know. I will find this extremely confusing to deal with. Nevertheless, I shall do my best and listen carefully to what the Minister says. I shall move my amendments only if I feel there are things left to discuss on them. She is at liberty to discuss any ideas I have put forward in my amendments in her reply to this group in the hope that it will render my moving them unnecessary.
The group as it is starts with an amendment covering what goods should not be taken. I see that the noble Baroness is finding it difficult to hear me. This is my first time in this Room since it has been refitted and I do not know how to position myself so that she can hear me.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lucas
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c95GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:45:28 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365725
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365725
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365725