I cannot agree with the hon. Gentleman, and nor do the London electorate. He will recall that, as recently as last May, they voted in a further eight Conservative boroughs. We oppose the transfer of those powers to the Mayor because we want local people to have a strong voice in how their neighbourhood evolves.
We are not alone in opposing those changes. Council leaders have branded the transfer of planning powers"““a power grab by the Mayor, who will be able to make decisions without paying any heed to local communities.””"
The City of London has spoken of its concern that the new powers will add new layers of decision making and delays with no discernable benefit to London’s economy or prosperity. The Government, in their own consultation, had to admit that most of those who were asked support no, or minimal, changes to the planning regime.
There we have it: London councils do not want this, London businesses do not want it and Londoners themselves do not want it. The only people who want those changes are Ministers who are keen to lavish powers on Labour’s prodigal son.
Communities and Local Government/Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Proceeding contribution from
Caroline Spelman
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 November 2006.
It occurred during Queen's speech debate on Communities and Local Government/Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
453 c273-4 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:27:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_359664
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_359664
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_359664