UK Parliament / Open data

Violent Crime Reduction Bill

Proceeding contribution from Bob Spink (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
It is a pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Broxbourne (Mr. Walker). His advice on this matter, as on so much else, is compelling. Although I support ADZs generally, I have one concern. The Minister will realise that the problem is getting the various authorities to follow the advice that he gives in his guidance. That does not always happen. Does he accept that the main way of tackling alcohol-driven street antisocial behaviour has been through the under-age drinking measure that was introduced in the first year of Labour’s power, the Confiscation of Alcohol (Young Persons) Act 1997? That is one of the most used non-traffic laws in the country. That excellent Act could be even more effective and reduce the need for ADZs if police always followed Ministers’ advice and involved parents, as the Act intended. That would enhance prevention and parental control, which we all agree is the best way forward. However, police do not always follow the guidance and they do not always apply that law in the way that was intended by involving the parents, so how will the Minister ensure that in the case of the Bill, the police listen to his advice and follow his guidance? Lords amendment No. 27 disagreed to.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
451 c46 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top