My Lords, I am most grateful for the support expressed for this amendment.
On Question, Motion agreed to.
17: Clause 94, page 51, line 42, at end insert ““, provided that such an Order is not to the detriment of those who have either benefited from or acted in reliance upon the state of the law before the retrospective Order is made””
21: Clause 149, page 82, line 14, at end insert ““, provided that such an Order is not to the detriment of those who have either benefited from or acted in reliance upon the state of the law before the retrospective Order is made””
22: Clause 150, page 82, line 40, at end insert ““, provided that such an Order is not to the detriment of those who have either benefited from or acted in reliance upon the state of the law before the retrospective Order is made””
The Commons disagree to these amendments for the following reason-
22A: Because it is desirable that an Order in Council under Clause 150 should be able to include any provision having retrospective effect which appears appropriate
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 July 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1568 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:28:31 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340625
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340625
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340625