We have just heard a long and detailed explanation—despite what the Minister thinks—so I shall not rehearse many of the arguments.
The amendments are an attempt to improve the scheme by introducing the concept of independence. There is broad consensus that we want a spirit of openness and honesty in the NHS; it needs to be part of the NHS culture. I know that attempts are being made to engender and promote that, with the emphasis on the reporting of incidents, which has quite a depressing effect because we then read reports that there are a million adverse incidents in the NHS in a year. Actually, it is good that any near miss—any slight problem—is reported, because we learn from those mistakes. We are moving towards a culture of openness and honesty, because people realise that in many instances there is no blame attached.
Disagreement has arisen, however, because the Government seem to be wedded to the idea that in-house investigation will promote further openness and honesty. Indeed, Members such as the hon. Member for Crawley (Laura Moffatt), who have considerable experience of the NHS, argue that point very powerfully.
I undertook my own very unscientific straw poll.
NHS Redress Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Sandra Gidley
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on NHS Redress Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c1546 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 20:43:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337418
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337418
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337418