It is helpful to clarify those points. I said that (2B) would be necessary to cover rare cases, for example, when the person who seeks redress is not the patient and it is considered appropriate to withhold some confidential health information. I want to emphasise that the scheme is flexible. There is provision for investigation reports to be released earlier in the process to individuals when the merits of the case require it. However, they would generally be provided at the end. There is, therefore, flexibility, but the Bill sets out what will happen in the normal course of events.
NHS Redress Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Andy Burnham
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on NHS Redress Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c1531-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 20:41:50 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379