My Lords, I understood that would be the intent from the way those paragraphs fall in the list. However, does the Minister not agree that the actual drafting is open to wider interpretation? I put that down as a marker. I would not want another order to have to be drafted to remedy it. I do not wish to make any difficulty tonight, and I certainly support the making of the order, but I feel there could be a concern.
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Order 2006
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 July 2006.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Order 2006.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c321 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 23:23:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335366
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335366
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335366