My Lords, where we may be at cross purposes is that Section 40 does not refer to detainee custody officers but to ““an authorised person””. But that authorised person, who has the functions that I described, may be a civilian employed by a contractor.
Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Amendments to Schedule 2) Order 2006
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 July 2006.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Amendments to Schedule 2) Order 2006.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c318 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 23:23:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360