My Lords, in all the debates that we have had this evening that was really the most predictable answer I have received. I expected that answer. It is not surprising, given the position of Scotland and the position of the Chancellor in the Government.
The noble Lord, Lord Barnett, did say that to me last night, almost in earshot of others. I know that he does not like his name being bandied about with the Barnett formula, and I respect that, but I wanted to draw attention to the inequalities of the Barnett formula as it affects Wales. I am sure that the Minister will appreciate that because of the low GDP of Wales, which is still around 80 or 81 per cent of the average—we have a 20 per cent deficit in GDP—we have less money circulating in Wales. The compensation provided for in the Barnett formula was in the region of 15 per cent additional. I notice the Minister was quoting figures of 3 and 5 per cent, as far as some elements of the Barnett formula were concerned. The point is that this has been continually eroded year on year. I wish to bring that to the attention of the House this evening. In the circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 124 [Annual Budget motions]:
[Amendment No. 74 not moved.]
Clause 135 [Examinations by Comptroller and Auditor General]:
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Livsey of Talgarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1299 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:44:25 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333102
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333102
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333102