My Lords, I was grateful for the support of the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, on the previous amendment. Although he supported a two-thirds majority to prevent a premature referendum, his amendment includes an arbitrary timescale. The Government do not oscillate between these two positions but are consistent. Our view is that there will need to be judgment on when the referendum should be taken so that damage is not done to the Assembly and the existing devolution settlement by a result against such enhancement of powers.
Of course noble Lords can disagree with this vision. The noble Lord, Lord Crickhowell, has been his usual eloquent self in identifying what he disagrees with. But the Liberal Democrat Members cannot have it both ways. If they agree it is intelligent that there should be judgment about this under a majority of support by elected Members of Parliament to take decisions on when the referendum should be held, there cannot be a case for an arbitrary time limit. That is why the noble Lord should withdraw the amendment.
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1294-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:30:34 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333095
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333095
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333095