My Lords, I did not say that at all. As my noble friend Lord Crickhowell and others on our side have said, we would campaign for Part 3. The noble Lord knows that there is to be a referendum under Part 4. As Part 3 is barely a step to Part 4, we think that the referendum should be extended to Part 3. The new clause replicates Clause 102 which, with Schedule 6, provides for a referendum prior to the implementation of Part 4. In the event that the new clause was accepted by the Government, Schedule 6 would have to be technically amended, and if the Government are not prepared to do it, I will do it by Third Reading. I beg to move.
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1248 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:30:07 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333029
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333029
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333029