My Lords, the noble Lord’s self-denying ordinance is a lesson to us all.
Obviously the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, has summed up the response that I would otherwise have given to the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan. There are obvious advantages in consulting on legislation that can be passed by this Parliament. We have indicated that in previous discussions about the Bill. It is clearly the case that, on certain occasions, the interests of Wales could be advanced more adroitly and effectively by legislation passed in this Parliament for the whole of the United Kingdom, of which Wales would be a part, in which case consultation would need to be carried out.
It is not for us to prescribe on the face of the Bill a Sewel-type convention. I think that we should be very careful about the name when we eventually arrive at it—so I am not accepting the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord Norton—but a process similar to that would be of advantage.
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1235 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:11:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333005
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333005
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333005