UK Parliament / Open data

Redwatch Website

Proceeding contribution from Lord Coaker (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 June 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Redwatch Website.
I cannot confirm whether that is the case, but I will clarify that and write to my hon. Friend with the information. It can also be an offence under the Data Protection Act 1998 for a website to publish a person’s name and address if that information is not in the public domain. I want to respond to an important point that my hon. Friend raised. Anything that is illegal off line is also illegal online. Therefore, if a UK-based website publishes material that is not only offensive but illegal under the above framework, action can be taken against the person who owns the website, exactly as with somebody who might have published a leaflet or a poster. However, operators of some websites have been careful to try to avoid overstepping the conduct that the legislation has defined as criminal. The difficulty occurs when the website is hosted outside UK jurisdiction, as in the case of Redwatch, which is hosted in the United States. In those circumstances, we do not have the power to close down that website, or, in some cases, to prosecute the people responsible for it if illegal material was not distributed in or uploaded from the UK. However, the offence of inciting others to commit crimes would not be exempt from prosecution in those circumstances, regardless of whether the perpetrator had used a website hosted in a foreign jurisdiction. That is a genuine challenge, which calls for greater international co-operation and collaboration. We seek to do that whenever we have the opportunity, and we have initiated inquiries with the US Department of Justice to establish whether hosting such a website constitutes a breach of US law, regulations or industry good practice. For UK-based websites, there is positive co-operation between internet service providers in this country and law enforcement agencies. Examples of that are the ““acceptable use”” policies, which most service providers put in place. They vary between companies, but will generally enable service providers to remove material from their site not only if it is illegal but in other circumstances. They may include complaints from people whose details have been published without their consent. I can inform my hon. Friend and other hon. Members who are present that I shall raise all those issues with the internet service providers the next time I meet them.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c1442-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top