My hon. Friend is right. All those institutions spend British taxpayers’ money, which is why it is so crucial that any report contains information about how all that money is spent and not just a narrow part of it.
In relation to new clauses 5 and 7, I highlight the fact that many people in this country see the limitations of aid in helping third-world countries and realise that in many respects trade will bring wealth to those countries. India and China are prime examples; they have lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty through trade, not through aid. It is essential that we explore how trade, not just aid, can help countries. With its protection rackets and tariffs, the European Union does an awful lot of harm to ensuring that third-world countries can trade their way out of poverty.
In conclusion, I urge the House to consider many of the amendments proposed by my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch. They will strengthen the excellent Bill promoted by the right hon. Member for Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill, as I hope he agrees. I hope that he acknowledges that they will increase the transparency that he wants to add to the reporting of international development aid.
International Development (Reporting and Transparency) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Philip Davies
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 16 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on International Development (Reporting and Transparency) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c1008 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 17:40:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330798
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330798
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330798