My Lords, I think the House is entitled to conclude that if the noble Baroness cannot give your Lordships a reason for the distinction, then the distinction is a mindless distinction. In those circumstances, I find that the Minister’s response adds fuel to my determination to seek the opinion of your Lordships’ House. I beg to move.
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 27) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 115; Not-Contents, 126.
[Amendment No. 28 not moved.]
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kingsland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Electoral Administration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c1308 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:00:19 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850